Socialism Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

Socialism - Essay ExampleMarx argues that unlike capitalism, which promotes competition the quest to make as a great deal profit as possible as well as at a lower placecut ones rivals and if want be scram them out of business, communism promotes corporation (Marx 276). This is a reasonable point in fact, one of the briny challenges of capitalism is the high competition which at times results in the ruining of business by their rivals. Additionally, since this is spurred by the need to maximize profits these capitalism ultimately ends up exploiting the workers who are sacrificed for the sake of bigger profits. His critique of underground property is in addition very well thought out and if it were adapted, it would solve much of the conflict that occurs in capitalism dominated world as many people struggle for the few available resources. He argues that limiting private ownership would render irrelevant the need for individuals to exploit others in the quest for riches since a ll would be owned collectively, he suggests that if all property was taken away from the hands of a chosen few, it would eliminate the desire and even reason for exploitation. Ideally this would be true, however the premises under which such a situation poop be applied cannot exist under normal circumstances. fence if property was communally owned, it would need to managed and developed and some people would have more responsibly than others in those duties. A skilled engineer will likely have to work harder and longer in a factory than a non-skilled laborer for instance, as a result, if we follow Marxs argument to its logical conclusion, It would cerebrate that those who do most of the work and those who hardly contribute at all would own equal shares in the property. Ultimately, it would not result in elimination, but simply inversion of the exploitation, this is because, there are those who will be working hard and explicateting the same amount as those who do not put in near ly as much effort. The argument against Marxs position on privatization of property can also be applied on the concept of equality in division of labor where ideally everyone would get the same wage, eventually, someone will be exploited. This is because the assumption that equal distribution of labor and pay can be achieved does not take to account the improbableness of equality of skills and responsibility. This argument flies in the submit of logic and as aforementioned can only be envisioned in an utopian ordination the main reason why communism has failed to take root in any society obscure from direct opposition by capitalism is its inherent unsustainability. In Marxs assumption, communism disregards the fact that its main tenets are directly in opposition of the very nature of the humans it intend to exist in it. Human beings will of all time want to compete with all(prenominal) other there will always be classes since we cannot be all equal. Capitalism gives people the f reedom to compete and lord over each other, in as much as it is exploitative to the workers, the same would be said of communism owe to the evident impossibility of logically dividing labor equally in a society whose populace own unequal skills. While taking cognizance of the fact that Marx is right in many ways closely the unequal and exploitive nature of capitalism, his conjecture on communism does not essentially provide viable alternative to capitalism. Rather